My commencement address to the history majors of UT Austin in June 2015

Ten years ago, in June 2015, I was privileged to give the commencement address to the graduating history majors of The University of Texas at Austin. I love its History Department, and it was an honor and a pleasure to speak to those brilliant recipients of the B.A. in history (plus a few advanced degree recipients as well)! Here is my address:

I.

When you look at the professors on this stage, what do you see?  Teachers of classes you have taken, people you have come to know over the past four years?  Yes, and more.  You know this, but for the benefit of your guests, I will also observe that the assembled professors on this small stage are representatives of what is one of the preeminent history faculties in our nation.

This is a faculty that includes the finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in History and the Bancroft Prize in American History, probably the most published historian in the nation, the winners of many excellence-in-teaching awards, and many other widely recognized and highly awarded professors.

These outstanding individuals were your teachers.  You have learned from the best!

II.
Those of us fortunate enough to hold degrees from the University of Texas at Austin will always have fond memories of our years here.  I spent two memorable years in Garrison Hall pursuing my master’s degree in history, way back in 1973-1975.

And my happiest memory of Garrison is meeting my wife in a history seminar titled “The Great Powers of Europe” in August of 1974!

III.
Today, based on my experiences since I was in Garrison Hall, I want to focus on this question:  

What is the REAL VALUE of your history degree?

As you know, there are those who do question its value.  Some of them may be seated in this audience right now!
I submit that you made a superb choice when you decided to major in history.

A.
To begin, we all acknowledge that the study of history is intrinsically important and valuable to the development and life of the intellect.  We study the past for a host of significant reasons.  We seek to learn and to understand what humans have done in the past and how and why they did those things.

Because we cannot go back in time, we read what has been written about it, we see the artifacts and fruits of prior times, and then we search for new and additional evidence to inform our understanding of those past events.  And yet, in William Faulkner’s words, which furnish the excellent name for the Department’s internet outreach to the world, the past is “Not Even Past.”

In a work I ran across recently titled “Race and Commemoration in a Southern City,” historian Katherine Walker harkens back to Faulkner’s words when she wrote:

The past is not even past. It lives on in the historical narratives we inherit, in the ways we use places, in the assumptions we make about art, in the shape of our political processes. The past lives on in our individual or collective identities; we garb ourselves in identities created in the past, perhaps accessorizing them, but rarely making them over out of new cloth.

You have learned these things of which the author speaks.  

Regardless whether your particular interest lies in cultural, political, social, economic, religious, environmental, presidential, or even legal history, and regardless the century or the place, from your studies in Garrison Hall you know these things.

So continue always to read history because it is our best guide to the future, really our only guide.

B.
But how can your study of history help you, after today, as you enter upon a career and in your daily work?

Your career will likely be a succession of jobs.  Your first job will not be your last job, and each of your jobs will become a stepping stone to the next one.  You likely will change careers more than once in the years ahead.  So how will your study and training in the methods of history help you?

The first of my answers to that question is that your research skills, analytical abilities, and the capability to write clear, explanatory sentences, paragraphs, and reports will serve you quite well.  These are skills that are, and will always be, in demand.  This is, in fact, a big advantage you have over the bachelor’s degree recipients in the Business School, who can no doubt ably insert numbers into Excel spreadsheets, but have not had the benefit of the opportunity to learn, from this faculty seated behind me, the art of writing clearly.

I understand that there are jobs out there for which you will not be qualified or hired.  Examples probably include highly specialized positions such as chemist, or electrical engineer or any kind of engineer, or computer scientist.  But I cannotthink of many more jobs for which you would not be qualified.

Some of you are going to be teachers of history, a very commendable choice of career. You will continue to spend a lot of time with history in the education of our youth.  There is nothing more valuable.

Others of you are headed to law school.  The study of history is good preparation for the legal profession because lawyers must find and then apply relevant statutes and the rules set forth in judicial opinions.  Researching and analyzing those statutes, their legislative histories, and the progression of the case law is an inherently historical exercise.

Still others of you will find employment in government and public service. Research, analysis, the evaluation of policies, and writing are key skills in these jobs.

Finally, there are those of you who will find employment in the sales of goods, properties, and services; in the creation and production of products and services of all types; in companies of all kinds, large and small; in bricks-and-mortar facilities, and over the Internet.

By earning a B.A. in history, you have proven that you can find and master primary sources of all types and can synthesize divergent interpretations and explanations.  So if in your first, or a subsequent, job, you need to do so, you can and will be able to learn tools of the marketplace such as how to read a balance sheet and an income statement, how buying and selling are conducted in the world of commerce, how a logistics business works, what a “back office” is, and many other forms and types of business activities, functions, and processes.  Your history degree will serve you well in these jobs.

In fact, in almost any job today, you will be asked to find and gather all manner of information, to try to make sense of it, and to write up your analysis and explanation for your employers and for your colleagues. These are qualitatively the same projects in which you have been engaged as a history major.

If you go to work for a company, its product or its service will inevitably be challenged and frequently superseded by a competitor’s newer, better, and cheaper product or service.  That is the nature of the market economy.  Your company will encounter these and other changes of all types.

How does the enterprise make sense of such changes?  That is again where historical training is a real asset.  You understand, as a history major, that nothing happens in a vacuum.  There is a context for each new development.  There is a history that can and does help to make sense of what is happening, even if it seems that the situation is new or totally unprecedented.

By finding the context, understanding the history, and formulating a path forward based on what can be learned and known, you will be using what you have learned as a history major and the skills you have obtained in earning a B.A. in Garrison Hall here at the University of Texas at Austin.

IV.
So I congratulate you on your accomplishments and your receipt of your degrees . . . . and I assure you that you have what it takes to be a success!



Jayne Mansfield Channeling Dr. Samuel Johnson

Recently on HBO+ Susan and I saw the documentary "My Mom Jayne," A Film by Mariska Hargitary." It covered the life of Jayne Mansfield, who was born and raised in Dallas. A highlight is from 35:54 to 38:40, a clip from her 1957 Ed Sullivan Show appearance. These photos are from that film, showing her playing the violin and then the piano. In between she addressed her audience:

"My playing the violin and now the piano reminds me of a famous story about Dr. Samuel Johnson. Once when he saw a little puppy walking on its hind legs, he said, "It's not that you expect him to do it perfectly; it's just that you're surprised the puppy does it all! Which just goes to prove that I not only play the violin and the piano, but I know who Dr. Samuel Johnson is!"
[She mangled the Dr. Johnson quotation a bit. Actually Johnson's quip was: "a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well but you are surprised to find it done at all." Boswell, Life of Samuel Johnson, LLD, 31 July 1763, at 327 (1960).]
Jayne Mansfield died in a tragic car crash. She was a substantial person, despite her popular persona.....







With the new war in the Middle East now, it is timely to reconsider the opposition of Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson of Dallas to the initiation of the Gulf War in 2003

Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson's Floor Statement Opposing Resolution Authorizing Military Force In Iraq

Washington, DC - Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, delivered the following statement yesterday on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives in opposition to the proposed resolution authorizing the President to use military force against Iraq:

"Mr. Speaker, I rise before you today with a high degree of frustration as we consider the grave prospect of authorizing the President to send our uniformed men and women into military action in Iraq.

"I believe I speak for all Members of Congress when I say that I am awed by the moral weight of this decision. We all know that any military action will likely lead to an immediate and substantial loss of human life and have untold implications on the security of our nation in the years to come.

"Mr. Speaker, no one desires to be on the opposite side of our President in times like these, but I regret to tell you that I am unable to support this resolution in its present form. I'd like to add to the record the statement issued by the Congressional Black Caucus outlining specific principles we believe must be addressed before military action should occur:

"We oppose a unilateral first-strike action by the United States without a clearly demonstrated and imminent threat of attack on the United States.

"Only Congress has the authority to declare war.

"Every conceivable diplomatic option must be exhausted.

"A unilateral first strike would undermine the moral authority of the United States, destabilize the Mideast region and undermine the ability of our nation to address unmet domestic priorities.

"Further, any post-strike plan for maintaining stability in the region would be costly and require a long-term commitment."

"Mr. Speaker, I believe the President has failed to address these principles.

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime poses a threat to the Iraqi people, to his neighbors in the Middle East, to the United States, and to the world at large with his biological and chemical weapons and his nuclear program. In the face of this legitimate threat, I cannot unequivocally count out future military action.

"However, I strongly believe that the most effective way of combating this menace is by solidifying the support of the international community and acting within the auspices of the United Nations, not by acting unilaterally.

"In the 1990's, we made significant progress in conjunction with our international allies through the United Nations weapons inspection program. This program led to the destruction of 40,000 chemical weapons, 100,000 gallons of chemicals used to manufacture weapons, 48 missiles, 30 warheads and a massive biological weapons facility equipped to produce anthrax.

"Inspections are a proven, non-violent, and internationally-supported method of thwarting Iraq's acquisition of weapons material and technology. What's more, a clear majority - 63 percent - of the American people want us to give inspectors the opportunity to work before we take military action.

"To this end, I am not convinced that giving the President the authority to launch a unilateral, first-strike attack on Iraq is the appropriate course of action at this time.

"While I believe that under international law and under the authority of our own Constitution, the United States must maintain the option to act in its own self-defense, I strongly believe that the Administration has not provided evidence of an imminent threat of attack on the United States that would justify a unilateral strike.

"I also believe that acting alone, without exhausting peaceable diplomatic options, could seriously harm global support for our war on terrorism and distract our own resources from this cause.

"I am disappointed that those who favor this resolution make no mention of the long-term commitment to nation-building that will be necessary in order to maintain stability in the Middle East region following an attack on Iraq. Thus far, this Administration has not made public any plans for our role in Iraq in the years, if not decades, to come after an attack.

"I cannot imagine that any of us believe this Administration and our nation is prepared to orchestrate and assume the entire financial burden of economic reconstruction, democratization and nation-building that will be necessary to stabilize a post-conflict Iraq. Let us not forget that this Congress would have to authorize aid for this long-term task at a time when we are still engaged in the Balkans and have only recently started to help in Afghanistan.

"Furthermore, our nation's economic recovery demands our immediate attention, and I am disturbed by reports that our nation's poverty rate, joblessness, and health care costs continue to rise at the same time personal wealth and retirement savings are being decimated. I fear the prospect of military action in Iraq will further distract our attention from an ominous economic outlook.

"So, before we undertake military operations in Iraq, we must ask ourselves some very basic questions:

"Does a war with Iraq improve our national security?

"Does it allow the United States to make peace through the power of our example?

"Does it allow us to focus on the economic suffering of our own people?

"Mr. Speaker, I believe the answer is a resounding NO. Therefore, I regret that I cannot vote with the President on this resolution."

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson

Wednesday, October 9, 2002

[This statement was published the next day in the New York Times. My son, who was legislative assistant to the Congresswoman, assisted in the preparation of this statement.]

A fine example of lawyers preserving legal history (the history of bankruptcy and the history of Texas):

Bravo for this video interview of the redoubtable Charlie Beckham, just finished with his tenure as President of the American College of Bankruptcy:

https://www.haynesboone.com/news/articles/beckham-in-macco-group-podcast-lessons-from-the-1980s-texas-oil-bust

This should serve as a model for other lawyers to do the same. Lawyers' abilities as questioners are helpful!

I have always thought lawyers could be historians too

When I was in law school at UT Austin, 1975-1978, I had come straight from history graduate school, also at UT, and I found and I have always believed that lawyers can be fine historians, assuming they know and follow the historical method. I recalled recently that I had published an article in the law students' newspaper back then, and with the help of the excellent Reference Desk at today's Jamail Law Library there, I have now a copy of that article, which I happily post here:




Announcing the revised version of my history of Chapter IX Municipal Bankruptcy

 Revised title: 

“Determining the Historiographical Problem of Municipal Bankruptcy: Enactment and Amendment of Chapter IX, 1933-1979”

available without charge at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5253527


a good summary of everyone's--regardless of immigration status--rights and recommendations when confronted

It is not a crime to be present in the USA without immigration documentation in hand. I'll be glad when peace and normalcy return and our citizens and noncitizen residents are safe, and we can all civilly discuss issues and solutions. Meanwhile, here is a good summary of everyone's--regardless of immigration status--rights and recommendations when confronted, from the Immigrant Legal Resource Center:

"1. You have the right to remain silent.

2. Remain calm and do not run away.

3. You have the right to demand a judicial warrant before letting ICE into your home.

4. You have a right to speak with a lawyer if you are arrested.

5. U.S. citizen allies can play a vital role. You have a right under the First Amendment to record or take photos in public view of law enforcement enforcement and ICE so long as you do not interfere with an arrest."

 https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/2025-08/KYR-One-Page.pdf